Authoritarian tightrope walk
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
How do 100 people walk a tightrope together? An experiment in large scale joint action
A lecture hall full of people played a computer game together. Their goal was to keep a tightrope walker balanced. Each had a handset that could deliver a left or right nudge. The tightrope walker was also pelted by tomatoes which knocked him off balance. Across several games, the difficulty of the task was changed by the frequency of tomatoes and whether or not they were visible. After each ga...
متن کاملLecture 8: Edge Tracking – Walking the Tightrope
In the subcritical transition scenario, there is typically a regime where the linearly stable basic state coexists with the turbulent state. The simplest model of this is a 1D system ẏ = y(12 − y)(y − 1) where the basic state is y = 0, the ‘turbulent’ state is y = 1 and there is an intermediate state y = 12 which separates initial conditions which become turbulent (if y(0) > 12 then y(t) → 1 as...
متن کاملWalking the Information Overload Tightrope
This chapter asks: What is information overload? At what levels of existence does it occur? Are there any features common to information overload at all these levels? What are information overload’s types? What are information overload’s current and future trends? What problems do they pose? How can they be addressed in both effective and morally justified ways? It argues that there is anarchy ...
متن کاملModeling authoritarian regimes
In the past few years, a body of ideas based on political economy theory has been built up by North and Weingast, Olson, Przeworski, and Acemoglu and Robinson. One theme that emerges from this literature concerns the transition to democracy: why would dominant elites give up oligarchic power? This article addresses this question by considering a formal model of an authoritarian regime, and then...
متن کاملAuthoritarian Governance with Public Communication ∗
Why would an authoritarian regime allow citizens to complain publicly if, as is often presumed, exchange of information among citizens invites social instability? This paper studies how an authoritarian regime allows citizens to publicly express preferences to strengthen its rule. We argue that public communication has two functions. First, it disorganizes the citizens or strengthens their disa...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Nature Human Behaviour
سال: 2018
ISSN: 2397-3374
DOI: 10.1038/s41562-018-0325-4